To amplify that point, my hon. Friend and I may be drawing the line in a different place, but presumably he does believe that anybody who attends as a witness at court to present forensic evidence should have some kind of scientific qualification that is certified and held as a standard, and which therefore underpins the expertise they are giving? Presumably he does not think that anybody could walk in off the street and present forensic evidence. There needs to be such a regulatory hurdle, as it were, before they are allowed to appear as an expert witness. I guess what we are saying, as the hon. Member for Bristol North West (Darren Jones) said, is that we would like to get to a situation where the question in people’s minds about whether these people are amateurs, cowboys or actually know what they are doing—on both sides, because do not forget the defence can present opposing forensic evidence should it so wish—is settled earlier.
Forensic Science Regulator and Biometrics Strategy Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Kit Malthouse
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Friday, 25 September 2020.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Forensic Science Regulator and Biometrics Strategy Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c1295 
Session
2019-21
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-28 13:49:21 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2020-09-25/20092511000017
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2020-09-25/20092511000017
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2020-09-25/20092511000017