I repeat that the case the Minister is making is supported on both sides of the House. I very much doubt that there will be a Division on Third Reading—certainly we on these Benches will be supporting the Bill at that time—so he does not need to make this case, because we all support him. The issue of this debate on new clause 1 and other alternatives is whether we can achieve the goals on which we all agree while also finding a way to implement existing Government policy on death penalty assurances. The Minister is recognised for working across the House—that is why he is held in such high regard—but it is our right to scrutinise legislation in this place, and in this debate we want to tease out whether we can find a way, through the treaties or through the Bill, to get those death penalty assurances that I am sure he also wants.
Crime (Overseas Production Orders) Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Ed Davey
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 30 January 2019.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Crime (Overseas Production Orders) Bill [Lords].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
653 c856 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2020-04-14 11:20:24 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-01-30/19013046000054
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-01-30/19013046000054
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-01-30/19013046000054