I thank the hon. Gentleman for that question, but I challenge the language he used—“crash out”—as it goes back to what I was saying about a sense of optimism. We are right to plan for no deal, because it would be patently ridiculous if we did not have every avenue covered as we seek to build our relationships with the rest of the EU; but saying that we will “crash out” suggests that there will be no planning at all, and I just do not share the pessimism of that view. Regarding the car industry, the hon. Gentleman gives a strong argument for why we need to do a deal and why countries such as Germany, which sells 10% of its cars to us, would want to do a deal with us. We can set our tariffs as we see fit, whether that is 10% or not, if we leave without a deal, but then we would have to have an equal tariff with other countries, unless we have a free trade agreement with them.
Leaving the European Union
Proceeding contribution from
Paul Scully
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 22 January 2018.
It occurred during e-petition debate on Leaving the European Union.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
635 c3WH 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2020-02-21 15:37:09 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-01-22/18012212000018
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-01-22/18012212000018
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-01-22/18012212000018