There seems to be a common concern on both sides of this debate, which is criminality. Both sides would say that criminality is wrong for conservation purposes. On that point, would those who oppose a ban on grouse shooting support vicarious liability, to make landowners responsible for criminality on their land? Is that not a potential solution we could all work together on?
Driven Grouse Shooting
Proceeding contribution from
Richard Arkless
(Scottish National Party)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 31 October 2016.
It occurred during e-petition debate on Driven Grouse Shooting.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
616 c243WH
Session
2016-17
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-02-08 15:07:09 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-10-31/16103121000021
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-10-31/16103121000021
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-10-31/16103121000021