I do not wish to revisit old debates about simplification, but does my hon. Friend have a view about the future strategy on anti-abuse rules? I believe that when Graham Aaronson examined the general anti-abuse rule, he thought that after about five years we would be able to start to do away with individual anti-avoidance rules and rely on the GAAR. We could therefore remove some of the more complicated provisions and the loopholes that go with them. Does my hon. Friend think that could work, or does he think it should be ruled out and that we must have both the general and specific rules?
Finance (No. 2) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Nigel Mills
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 25 March 2015.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Finance (No. 2) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
594 c1442 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2015-04-08 17:57:16 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-03-25/15032574000253
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-03-25/15032574000253
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-03-25/15032574000253