That is a very good question, which I hope to be able to deal with towards the end of my speech. The assumption of spending 2% of GDP on defence, which is essential because we organised an entire NATO summit around the idea of doing that, is of course the hope that as the economy grows, defence spending will grow and we can make the necessary five-year planning, which will return confidence to the armed forces and allow us to make some of these investments. The question is a good one, because we would still face significant constraints in relation to Trident and to operating our aircraft carrier. If we wanted to make significant investments in restoring armour capacity, even 2% of GDP would be pushing it.
Defence and Security Review (NATO)
Proceeding contribution from
Rory Stewart
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 2 March 2015.
It occurred during Estimates day on Defence and Security Review (NATO).
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
593 c735 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-07-05 09:44:31 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-03-02/15030240000014
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-03-02/15030240000014
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-03-02/15030240000014