The hon. Gentleman is absolutely correct. The wording of the e-petition refers to stunning versus non-stunning, but we cannot have a complete debate about this subject unless we tackle the religious dimension because that is the elephant in the room. I have been led down that path in the first few minutes of the debate because that is the understandable concern of Muslim and Jewish communities. He is correct that the wording of the e-petition and the purpose of the debate is about stunned versus non-stunned, but we soon come on to other issues.
Animal Welfare (Non-stun Slaughter)
Proceeding contribution from
Philip Hollobone
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 23 February 2015.
It occurred during Backbench debate
and
e-petition debate on Animal Welfare (Non-stun Slaughter).
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
593 c4WH 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-04-17 17:19:59 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-02-23/15022324000024
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-02-23/15022324000024
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-02-23/15022324000024