I congratulate the hon. Gentleman on his very good approach to this issue. To reiterate, the point he has been trying to make is that this debate is not about religions, but about the non-stunning of animals for slaughter. As he pointed out, one of the reasons why we need labelling is to show the scale of this in Britain today—at least 4 million to 5 million beasts. That is before we get to the question of poultry: 900 million such birds are slaughtered in the UK every year, 90 million without any stunning whatsoever. This is a big issue, but it is not about differences with religions or anything else; it is about stunning and non-stunning.
Animal Welfare (Non-stun Slaughter)
Proceeding contribution from
Alan Meale
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 23 February 2015.
It occurred during Backbench debate
and
e-petition debate on Animal Welfare (Non-stun Slaughter).
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
593 c4WH 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-04-17 17:19:59 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-02-23/15022324000023
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-02-23/15022324000023
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-02-23/15022324000023