I will take an intervention shortly. My hon. Friend the Member for Heywood and Middleton (Liz McInnes) mentioned the Zhang study. That study was not considered by the HFEA. Even if we said that Chinese medicine is terrible and that 10 years ago it was irrelevant and not ethical, the HFEA should still have considered it, but it did not. A number of Members have claimed that mitochondrial donation is like blood transfusion—nothing more than that. Well, no it is not like that. It is modifying the human germ line. As the HFEA has said, maternal spindle transfer is genetic modification of the egg and pronuclear transfer is genetic modification of the embryo. Think about it, colleagues. Why are we in the Chamber today to discuss this procedure if it is not genetic modification? If changing the germ line is not genetic modification, we do not need the statutory instrument. The HFEA could get on with it. It has therefore answered itself.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology
Proceeding contribution from
Robert Flello
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 3 February 2015.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Human Fertilisation and Embryology.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
592 c176 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-04-17 17:19:18 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-02-03/15020361000042
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-02-03/15020361000042
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-02-03/15020361000042