Yes, that is right. As I said, this is a significant change in terms of public policy assumptions. To be frank—this is not a criticism of a particular Government—post-war Governments have not always approached infrastructure as well as they might have done. There are all kinds of reasons for that, such as a nervousness about binding the hands of one’s successors or a reluctance to get these big decisions wrong. In democratic politics, there is a pressure towards delivering results in a five-year span—understandably, as we all have to be re-elected—and some of the decisions we are making in this strategy will have a payback over a much longer period than that. When building roads, rather like power stations and significant railway projects, the reward in terms of well-being and economic activity has a reverberating effect for many decades. As a result, Governments sometimes do not take these big but necessary decisions that serve the national interest.
Infrastructure Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
John Hayes
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 26 January 2015.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Infrastructure Bill [Lords].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
591 c665 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-03-22 11:21:48 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-01-26/15012631000119
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-01-26/15012631000119
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-01-26/15012631000119