One of my problems is that the Secretary of State is trying to prove the general from the particular. We both lived through the Richard III case, and we can all learn from that, but it is not the case to build his case upon. I happen to think that the Richard III case permission hearing—it was all on paper—was wrongly decided, but that is by the way, because the eventual divisional court decision was in favour of the Government. However, I urge him not to be persuaded by the facts of that case, which could persuade someone to reach a conclusion similar to his, but to look at the wider picture and to think about what our hon. and learned Friend the Member for Torridge and West Devon said about exceptional circumstances. He should try to get at the problem that way, rather than banging his head against the wall, as he currently seems to be doing.
Criminal Justice and Courts Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Garnier
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 13 January 2015.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Criminal Justice and Courts Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
590 c823 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-02-16 14:02:30 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-01-13/15011364000817
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-01-13/15011364000817
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-01-13/15011364000817