I applaud the Minister for being open-minded about this issue and I realise he is describing a process, but it really does not make sense to include specific wording in primary legislation and then say, “We will probably amend it, once we’ve done the user-testing, in secondary legislation”, because no one will know that. When they go to the primary legislation, they will find different words from those that will appear on the petition form. If I may gently say so, it really would make more sense to get rid of this clause, put “the Minister may, by order, prescribe the words” and let him get on with it by secondary legislation. That is not a Henry VIII clause—Henry VIII would have had just one signature, anyway. It is just sensible legislation.
Recall of MPs Bill
Proceeding contribution from
David Heath
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 3 November 2014.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Recall of MPs Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
587 c587 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-04 15:14:29 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-11-03/14110325000069
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-11-03/14110325000069
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-11-03/14110325000069