The figure is £7,000, and the right hon. Gentleman is right to say that the figure comes out of the overall cost of the scheme—out of the 3%. If the claimant pays less than that figure, they keep the difference—thus, it becomes part of their compensation. We discussed the reason why the figure moved in Committee and in the Lords: it was felt that £2,000 was too low and so people would not get the sort of legal advice they needed. We desperately did not want the situation that had happened with other schemes whereby the legal teams got more money out of the compensation than that—that is why the figure is £7,000. In the negotiations I have been having, the feeling has been that the actual amount will be less, so the recipients or their loved ones will get the difference.
Mesothelioma Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Mike Penning
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 7 January 2014.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Mesothelioma Bill [Lords].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
573 c214 
Session
2013-14
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2014-01-09 12:19:07 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-01-07/14010751000639
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-01-07/14010751000639
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-01-07/14010751000639