I am grateful to the hon. Lady for giving way and apologise for missing her opening remarks. She is right that perturbation is a key issue, but she is not right to say that the Independent Scientific Group trials were based on hard boundaries. The fact is that the areas had to be exactly 100 sq km, otherwise they would not have been comparable. The boundaries therefore had to be accepted largely as they were. The difference with the current culls is that they do not have a maximum size, so the zone can be chosen to meet whatever good hard boundaries can be found and steps can be taken to minimise perturbation. The net benefit should therefore be much higher than was achieved in the ISG trials.
Badger Cull
Proceeding contribution from
James Paice
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 5 June 2013.
It occurred during Opposition day on Badger Cull.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
563 c1523 
Session
2013-14
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-09-12 10:48:49 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-06-05/13060568000226
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-06-05/13060568000226
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-06-05/13060568000226