Regrettably, the only reason this proposal would have any economic benefit is that the scale of such developments would be so large that people would scramble to go and get the thing built before anybody could object to it. I am very unhappy about it. In 2005 we had the high hedges legislation, whereby anything over 2 metres was considered to be un-neighbourly, and now we are hearing proposals for something that is 4 metres high by 8 metres. This will potentially be extremely divisive in communities. I really feel that the Secretary of State could have offered us a little more today, although I know that he is in a very difficult place in this regard. I believe that in areas such as St Albans, particularly when we have no definitions of curtilage or gardens, this will be a very divisive and ruinous issue.
Growth and Infrastructure Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Anne Main
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 16 April 2013.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Growth and Infrastructure Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
561 c205 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-07-30 16:47:30 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-04-16/13041638000985
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-04-16/13041638000985
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-04-16/13041638000985