UK Parliament / Open data

Justice and Security Bill [Lords]

I do not think that the Minister’s saying that the poor quality of debate in this House is a good reason for not having annual renewal is his best point. Will he deal with a point on which I do not think he agrees with me? New provisions have been introduced to the Bill, in Committee, where they at least received some debate, and today. Amendment 46, in particular, seems to allow material that is irrelevant to the proceedings to trigger a CMP, which is a massive change that has

not been debated at all because we have not had time to do so. Is that not a reason for allowing renewal after a short time?

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
559 c776 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top