I do not know, because it has not been made public. That is a complete irrelevance, however. It is not a reasonable argument, because the situation in this case is the same as it is for judges: if everybody obeyed the law, we would not need any judges, but we would still have them, just in case. There is ample evidence that there will be cases for the adjudicator to adjudicate on, however. The Bill contains a number of limiting provisions, too: the adjudicator can decide not to take up a reference; the adjudicator can fine somebody if the reference has no serious foundation; and the adjudicator’s job is only to arbitrate on alleged breaches of the code, which is quite a narrowly drawn document. I strongly believe the Bill is right as drafted.
Groceries Code Adjudicator Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
James Paice
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 26 February 2013.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Groceries Code Adjudicator Bill [Lords].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
559 c204 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2013-11-20 10:40:11 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-02-26/13022662000443
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-02-26/13022662000443
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-02-26/13022662000443