My hon. Friend makes a good point. There are different ways of doing these things. Perhaps there should be a combination of both. The Scrap Metal Dealers Bill, which passed through this House not long ago, had both, owing to an amendment that I tabled. It had a review that took place after three years; it also incorporates a sunset clause whereby, after five years, the Act would expire and would have to be brought back again if it was seen to be worth while. So I think my hon. Friend is on to something. But of course, it would be difficult to justify a sunset clause without a cost-benefit analysis to help us decide whether we wished to extend the legislation or wished it to expire.
Antarctic Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Philip Davies
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Friday, 18 January 2013.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Antarctic Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
556 c1160 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2013-11-19 10:39:26 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-01-18/13011842000135
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-01-18/13011842000135
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-01-18/13011842000135