Both the Treasury Committee and the Joint Committee on the draft Financial Services Bill were concerned about the important parts of the Bill that will be delivered through statutory instruments. That means a discussion in Committee for an hour and a half, with no provision for amendment. We would either have to accept the whole instrument or vote against it, and we would not have a majority on such a Committee. We pressed the Chancellor for a different, more flexible structure of decision making on secondary legislation so that the House or the Treasury Committee could debate it with the prospect of convincing the Chancellor, at some stage, to amend his direction of travel.
Financial Services Bill
Proceeding contribution from
George Mudie
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 10 December 2012.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Financial Services Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
555 c78 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-11-26 10:42:08 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2012-12-10/12121029000116
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2012-12-10/12121029000116
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2012-12-10/12121029000116