National policy statement for waste water. Debate on a motion to take note of and approve. Agreed on question.
National Policy Statement (Waste Water)
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
542 c589-614
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Proceeding contributions
Lord Benyon | 542 c611-4 (Link to this contribution)
With the leave of the House, I will respond to the points raised in the debate. I apologise if my re...
Lord Benyon | 542 c589 (Link to this contribution)
I beg to move,"That this House takes note of and approves the National Policy Statement for Waste Wa...
Show all contributions (20)
Andrew Love | 542 c592 (Link to this contribution)
One concern about both the development at Deephams and the Thames tunnel is the role of Ofwat. There...
Lord Benyon | 542 c591-2 (Link to this contribution)
Like my right hon. Friend, I am concerned about the cost of the project. That is why my Department h...
Gavin Shuker | 542 c593-6 (Link to this contribution)
I note that debates in the House on waste water are rather like the No. 159 bus that serves the Hous...
Speaker | 542 c589 (Link to this contribution)
Order. I will make the judgments about the length of interventions, thank you. We want short interve...
Andy Slaughter | 542 c589 (Link to this contribution)
The Minister is being his usual modest self in saying that he was not au fait with the subject. He i...
Simon Hughes | 542 c591 (Link to this contribution)
One of the arguments that the Minister has just made is that the proposed tunnel is the most cost-ef...
Lord Benyon | 542 c589-91 (Link to this contribution)
I think I got the gist of it. I will come on to cover the key points that were made by the Environme...
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering | 542 c597-600 (Link to this contribution)
It is a pleasure to follow the hon. Member for Luton South (Gavin Shuker). I, too, welcome the debat...
Gavin Shuker | 542 c596-7 (Link to this contribution)
I completely agree with my hon. Friend that it is appropriate to recognise major, nationally signifi...
Andy Slaughter | 542 c596 (Link to this contribution)
I wonder whether I might put to my hon. Friend the question I put to the Minister, but did not get a...
Simon Hughes | 542 c608-11 (Link to this contribution)
I am grateful for the opportunity to have this debate, but I am conscious that it must finish at 10 ...
Mark Field | 542 c604-8 (Link to this contribution)
I accept the hon. Gentleman's point, but there is the issue of the sheer cost of the proposal, and w...
Jeremy Corbyn | 542 c604 (Link to this contribution)
The hon. Gentleman mentioned my contribution last week. Surely there is irrefutable evidence that in...
Mark Field | 542 c604 (Link to this contribution)
I accept that there would be an impact, but the use of the word ““effluent”” in relation to the 39 m...
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering | 542 c603-4 (Link to this contribution)
When the Committee put questions on the national policy statement to the Department, we asked partic...
Mark Field | 542 c602-3 (Link to this contribution)
I am one of 144 Members of Parliament in the Thames Water area directly affected by the issue of the...
Lord Benyon | 542 c592-3 (Link to this contribution)
I can assure the hon. Gentleman that that is a matter of great importance to Ofwat. It has agreed fu...
Andrew Love | 542 c600-2 (Link to this contribution)
I thank the Minister for ensuring that we have this debate, especially as I had begun to lose faith ...
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-05 21:02:12 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_98176
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_98176
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_98176