UK Parliament / Open data

Industry and Exports (Financial Support) Bill

Debate on bills and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Tuesday, 21 April 2009, in the House of Commons, led by Ian Pearson. The answering member was Mark Prisk.
Industry and Exports (Financial Support) Bill. Programme motion (No. 2) on proceedings in Committee, on Report and Third Reading. Agreed to on question. Committee stage. Clauses 1 to 3 agreed to. Bill reported without amendment. Third reading debate. Agreed to on question and Bill passed.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
491 c154-69 
Session
2008-09
Legislative stage
Committee stage, Third reading and Report stage
Procedure
Programme motions
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Proceeding contributions
Baroness Burt of Solihull | 491 c156 (Link to this contribution) I shall be brief, Sir Alan, as most of what I want to say will come towards the end of our proceedin...
Mark Prisk | 491 c155-6 (Link to this contribution) I welcome you to the Chair, Sir Alan, for the Committee stage of our proceedings. Clause 1 amends t...

Show all contributions (21)
Ian Pearson | 491 c156-7 (Link to this contribution) Clause 1 is essential to enable the section 8 power of the Industrial Development Act 1982 to contin...
Mark Prisk | 491 c157 (Link to this contribution) The annual report can be helpful, but as the Minister will understand and Members on both sides of t...
Ian Pearson | 491 c158 (Link to this contribution) No, I am not saying that. I want to draw a distinction between schemes that have been in the annual ...
Baroness Burt of Solihull | 491 c158 (Link to this contribution) I am sure that all Members welcome any funding that is finally trickling through to business. The Mi...
Mark Prisk | 491 c158 (Link to this contribution) The Minister tells us that the three principal schemes include the Post Office reinvention programme...
Ian Pearson | 491 c159-60 (Link to this contribution) I certainly accept that the reason why we need to increase the limits is that a lot of the programme...
Baroness Burt of Solihull | 491 c160-1 (Link to this contribution) I beg to move amendment 1, in page 1, line 23, at end add— ‘(3) Arrangements falling within subsect...
Ian Pearson | 491 c158-9 (Link to this contribution) Let me clarify the situation. Jaguar Land Rover has successfully applied to the EIB for a loan to un...
Mark Prisk | 491 c159 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister, not least for being generous in giving way. I return to my original p...
Elliot Morley | 491 c161 (Link to this contribution) I want to make several points about clause 2, which are very much in line with the comments of the h...
Mark Prisk | 491 c161-2 (Link to this contribution) I commend the hon. Member for Solihull (Lorely Burt) for tabling amendment 1, not least because I ho...
Ian Pearson | 491 c162-5 (Link to this contribution) I can indeed assure the Committee that there is nothing in clause 2 that dilutes the high environmen...
Baroness Burt of Solihull | 491 c165 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister for his thorough explanation, and for all his technical explanations o...
Ian Pearson | 491 c165-7 (Link to this contribution) I beg to move, That the Bill be now read the Third time. This is a small Bill with just three claus...
Mark Prisk | 491 c167 (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for the courteous way in which he deals with my many and often detailed questio...
Baroness Burt of Solihull | 491 c167-8 (Link to this contribution) As the Minister said in his opening remarks, this is a small Bill of huge importance to industry and...
Speaker | 491 c168 (Link to this contribution) Order. I have given the hon. Lady some leniency, but on Third Reading we are meant to be discussing ...
Baroness Burt of Solihull | 491 c168-70 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful for your guidance, Madam Deputy Speaker. I was merely trying to talk about what the Bi...
Ian Pearson | 491 c157-8 (Link to this contribution) I understand the hon. Gentleman's point and I undertake to consider it. If we lay affirmative resolu...
Back to top