UK Parliament / Open data

National Lottery Bill

National Lottery Bill. Lords Committee stage first day. Clauses 1-13 agreed to. Schedule 1 and 2 agreed to. New clauses considered. (Part 1 of 3)
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
679 c975-1009 
Session
2005-06
Legislative stage
Committee stage
Procedure
New clauses
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
National Lottery Bill. Brought from Commons. Explanatory notes HL Bill 67-EN also published.
Friday, 20 January 2006
Bills
House of Lords
National Lottery Bill
Monday, 13 March 2006
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords
National Lottery Bill
Monday, 13 March 2006
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Lord Clement-Jones | 679 c989-90 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, on these Benches, we strongly support both Amendment No. 2 and Amendment No. 4. Perhaps it...
Viscount Astor | 679 c988-9 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 2:"Page 5, line 13, leave out ““prescribed””" The noble Viscount said: The amen...

Show all contributions (42)
Lord Davies of Oldham | 679 c986-7 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful for the breathless way in which the noble Viscount asked his question. The clause is a...
Viscount Astor | 679 c987-8 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister for his reply. It adds clarity to the debate that we had on Second Rea...
Lord Davies of Oldham | 679 c975 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that the House do now resolve itself into Committee on this Bill. Moved acc...
Viscount Astor | 679 c975 (Link to this contribution) I apologise for being in a slight rush. The preceding business went marginally faster than I had exp...
Viscount Astor | 679 c994-5 (Link to this contribution) The Minister said he hoped that he had convinced me. He convinced me of one thing: how much I dislik...
Lord Davies of Oldham | 679 c995-6 (Link to this contribution) I am only too happy to enlighten the movers of amendments in Committee if it is within my power to d...
Lord Clement-Jones | 679 c996 (Link to this contribution) I hear what the Minister is saying about the themes, and he has explained to a greater extent how th...
Viscount Astor | 679 c990 (Link to this contribution) Before the Minister replies, I apologise to him. When I was moving Amendment No. 2, I should also ha...
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville | 679 c990-1 (Link to this contribution) I apologise for intervening as the Minister is about to speak, but it is probably easier if I speak ...
Lord Davies of Oldham | 679 c991-3 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to Members of the Committee for their contribution to this debate. We have at least on...
Lord Clement-Jones | 679 c993-4 (Link to this contribution) I am sure the noble Viscount, Lord Astor, will have plenty to say in reply, but I have a few questio...
Lord Clement-Jones | 679 c990 (Link to this contribution) Is the noble Baroness saying that these words which we are seeking to delete are not an extension of...
Baroness Pitkeathley | 679 c990 (Link to this contribution) They are not an extension of power; they deal with the large areas where the lottery money should go...
Lord Davies of Oldham | 679 c999 (Link to this contribution) I am not sure what the noble Viscount is describing. Organisations involved in bids will have very c...
Viscount Astor | 679 c999-1000 (Link to this contribution) My noble friends Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville and Lord Eccles successfully exploded much of the ...
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville | 679 c998-9 (Link to this contribution) I absolutely bow to the view of the Minister that I was making paving remarks in my earlier interven...
Viscount Eccles | 679 c999 (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I may add to that. Obviously, it would be tremendously helpful if we were to conclude that t...
Lord Davies of Oldham | 679 c998 (Link to this contribution) We are not going to prescribe amounts of expenditure. That would be prescription with a vengeance. T...
Lord Clement-Jones | 679 c998 (Link to this contribution) The Minister has given assurance after assurance, but does he not agree that the root cause of the p...
Lord Davies of Oldham | 679 c997 (Link to this contribution) The noble Viscount has described what is going on now—and we intend to change that. So I hope that h...
Viscount Astor | 679 c997-8 (Link to this contribution) If we follow the Minister’s argument and agree to it, the Bill, as he says, will allow the Governmen...
Viscount Astor | 679 c996 (Link to this contribution) We will give the noble Lord two questions at the same time to see how he deals with that. We have a ...
Lord Clement-Jones | 679 c1000-1 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 3:"Page 5, line 18, at end insert—" ““(2A)   After subsection (3) insert— ““(3...
Baroness Pitkeathley | 679 c1001-2 (Link to this contribution) I must take issue with the noble Viscount about the great majority of the New Opportunities Fund goi...
Viscount Eccles | 679 c1001 (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I may ask about the definition of third sector. Is it the case that there are three sectors:...
Lord Davies of Oldham | 679 c1002-3 (Link to this contribution) If, after our last debate, there was just a slight niggle in the noble Viscount’s mind about whether...
Lord Clement-Jones | 679 c1003 (Link to this contribution) It might be useful if the Minister responded to me on this matter now, rather than at the end. On 14...
Lord Clement-Jones | 679 c1003 (Link to this contribution) I understand what the Minister is saying, but is he not giving us that assurance?
Lord Davies of Oldham | 679 c1003 (Link to this contribution) We are underwriting that, but we are not putting it into the Bill—in our view, for very good reasons...
Lord Clement-Jones | 679 c1004 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister, as I did feel that I had to push him uphill on this. He is always opt...
Lord Davies of Oldham | 679 c1003-4 (Link to this contribution) I thought that I had already done so. If I have not, I am fully prepared to meet that request and co...
Viscount Astor | 679 c1004-5 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 5:"After Clause 7, insert the following new clause—" ““NATIONAL ACQUISITIONS F...
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville | 679 c1005-6 (Link to this contribution) I support the probing amendment tabled by my noble friend Lord Astor. I shall make one historical ob...
Lord Davies of Oldham | 679 c1006-8 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to both noble Lords who have spoken in the debate. I recognise that this is a probing ...
Lord Davies of Oldham | 679 c1009 (Link to this contribution) I beg to move that the House do now resume. Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to.
Viscount Astor | 679 c1008-9 (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for giving me a steer on what my amendment should be at Report. He clearly said...
Lord Davies of Oldham | 679 c1008 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble Lord for identifying the canniness of the Scots’ art gallery and museum, ...
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville | 679 c1008 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister for his response. In the spirit of that, I acknowledge that any noble ...
Baroness Pitkeathley | 679 c990 (Link to this contribution) I declare an interest as the former chair of the New Opportunities Fund. I do not see that the amend...
Viscount Eccles | 679 c996-7 (Link to this contribution) Before the Minister replies, I apologise for not being here at the start of the Committee. As a rela...
Back to top