UK Parliament / Open data

Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill

I encountered a Member of the House of Lords yesterday. She said, ““I hope you will agree that we have done a good job on this Bill.”” I said, ““You have done a brilliant job, but it is all going to be overturned by the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats in the House of Commons tomorrow.”” The fact is that this Government, who do not need finance for their own legal aid, are forcing people to obtain legal advice by telephone operator. If they hold constituency surgeries, they will know that people cannot present a concise account of their problems. They have to discuss them, and when they have discussed them, it is possible to get to the core of what they need and help them—but these people do not care about that. I will say this, Mr Deputy Speaker. It is out of order in this House of Commons to accuse anyone of hypocrisy, so I— Debate interrupted (Programme Order, this day). The Deputy Speaker put forthwith the Question already proposed from the Chair (Standing Order No. 83F), That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 1. The House divided: Ayes 300, Noes 251.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
543 c207-8 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top