UK Parliament / Open data

Health and Social Care Bill

Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 19 March 2012. It occurred during Debate on bills on Health and Social Care Bill.
24: Schedule 5, page 333, line 22, leave out sub-paragraphs (2) to (4) and insert— ““(2) In subsections (6A) and (6B)— (a) after ““by a”” insert ““clinical commissioning group or””, and (b) omit ““Primary Care Trust or””. (3) After subsection (6B), insert— ““(6C) The references in subsections (6A) and (6B) to a clinical commissioning group are, so far as necessary for the purposes of regulations under section 117(2E) of the Mental Health Act 1983, to be read as references to the National Health Service Commissioning Board.”””” 25: Schedule 5, page 346, line 25, leave out paragraph 71 26: Schedule 5, page 354, line 4, leave out paragraph 120 27: Schedule 5, page 359, line 36, after second ““under”” insert ““section 12A or”” 28: Schedule 5, page 360, line 2, leave out paragraph 148 29: Schedule 5, page 360, line 7, leave out paragraph 150 Amendments 24 to 29 agreed. Motion Moved by Moved by Earl Howe That the Bill do now pass. Amendment to the Motion That the Bill do now pass. Amendment to the Motion Moved by Moved by Baroness Thornton As an amendment to the Motion that the Bill do now pass, to leave out from ““that”” to the end and insert ““this House declines to allow the Bill to pass, because the Bill does not command the support of patients who depend on the National Health Service, the professionals who are expected to make it work, or the public; will not deliver the promised objectives of genuinely empowering clinicians in the commissioning process and putting patients at the heart of the system; will increase bureaucracy and fragment commissioning; will allow foundation trusts to raise up to half their income from private patients; and, despite amendment, still creates an economic regulator and regime which will lead to the fragmentation and marketisation of the National Health Service and threaten its ethos and purpose.””
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
736 c705-6 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Back to top