Will the Minister consider whether the mode of investigation of alleged breaches of these codes of impartiality and independence could be improved? This is a continuing and growing anxiety across a wide spectrum of those involved in public affairs. Other professionals have modes of inquiry which enable the cases to be argued and a decision to be made. I think for example of the General Medical Council, which will decide whether or not there has been an impropriety. A purely hierarchical approach to the Civil Service on matters of this kind is not entirely adequate. We need to discuss, perhaps with the First Division Association, whether it would be encouraged to feel that its service would be greatly strengthened by there being such a procedure for looking at complaints which are made by affected members or the public generally.
Scotland Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Maclennan of Rogart
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 March 2012.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Scotland Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
736 c543 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 16:09:49 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_818646
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_818646
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_818646