That this House do not insist on its Amendment 17 to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 17A and do agree with the Commons in their Amendment 19A. "LORDS AMENDMENTS 17 AND 19"
17: Clause 51, page 36, line 19, leave out ““365 days”” and insert ““a prescribed number of days which must be at least 730””
COMMONS DISAGREEMENT AND REASON
The Commons disagree to Lords Amendment No. 17 for the following Reason—
17A: Because it would alter the financial arrangements made by the Commons, and the Commons do not offer any further Reason, trusting that this Reason may be deemed sufficient.
19: Page 36, line 30, at end insert—
““(2A) The period for which a person is entitled to a contributory allowance by virtue of the third condition set out in Part 1 of Schedule 1 (youth) shall not exceed a prescribed number of days which must be at least 730.””
COMMONS AGREEMENT WITH AMENDMENT
The Commons agree to this Amendment with the following Amendment—
19A: Line 4, leave out ““a prescribed number of days which must be at least 730”” and insert ““365 days””
Welfare Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Freud
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 14 February 2012.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Welfare Reform Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
735 c736 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 15:42:43 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_809726
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_809726
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_809726