UK Parliament / Open data

Local Government Finance Bill

Proceeding contribution from Robert Neill (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 10 January 2012. It occurred during Debate on bills on Local Government Finance Bill.
There has been little time, and I intend to make a few points, if I may. Secondly, and particularly regrettably, there was the simplistic analysis and the misleading attempt in the debate to create a false north-south divide—particularly disgraceful, it might be thought, when one has only to look at the facts and observe that over the last five-year revaluation period, when the average business rate growth in England was 5%, the following authorities had business rate growth above the average, and therefore would have benefited more than average had our proposed system been in place: Doncaster, Durham, Greenwich, Hull, Liverpool, Manchester, North Tyneside, South Tyneside, Sunderland, Sefton, Stockton, Middlesbrough—[Interruption.] No, I am not prepared to take any lectures from Labour Members when they cannot get the facts right. I will give way once, briefly.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
538 c131 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top