Welfare Reform Bill

My point is that we will try to minimise those costs by not having reassessments in those circumstances. I cannot put a precise figure on it but I can tell the noble Baroness that our ambition is to have as low a cost as possible in those circumstances. Assessors and decision-makers should be empowered to make these decisions based on the circumstances of the case and with the aid of departmental guidance. These matters should not be prescribed by the Government through legislation. Only by doing it that way will we achieve the personalised approach we desire. Picking up in slightly more detail the point made by the noble Earl, Lord Listowel, we are working through the procurement process at the moment and will recognise the importance of appropriate quality measures and controls as part of the contracting process. This will ensure staff are properly supported as well as supervised. An example of this is the legislative requirement for assessors to be approved by the Secretary of State. This will require ongoing demonstration of competence. The noble Baroness, Lady O’Loan, raised a point about the UN convention. The introduction of PIP is compliant and the co-production has involved disabled people at all stages. We have committed to undertake a full consultation exercise and will take into account fully the views of disabled people. In addition, there is full compliance with the European Convention on Human Rights. Given the assurances I have provided, I urge the noble Baroness to withdraw her amendment.