My Lords, I strongly support this amendment and perhaps I might read it out, because it is a long time since we first started talking about it. It would insert: "““including a requirement for the decision maker to collect evidence from the claimant’s own health care professionals as a part of the decision making process””."
There is a strong suspicion that this is not always done. The only thing that I would quibble with in that amendment is that not only does the decision-maker have to collect evidence, it has to be taken into account when the decision-making process is gone into.
My question for my noble friend is about a sentence that I found in one of the documents we were given—I cannot now remember which one it is. It says: "““Decision Makers will change erroneous decisions rather than send them to a Tribunal””."
The next sentence says: "““If a claimant’s points at issue are not resolved, they can still appeal to the HM Courts & Tribunals Service””."
I had to go to a tribunal having had my papers re-examined, presumably by a decision- maker. What will change about the process now with PIP? I am not quite sure, reading between the lines, what the two sentences that I have read out mean. Are things going to change from now, or not?
Welfare Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Thomas of Winchester
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 16 November 2011.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
732 c257-8GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 21:18:05 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_785960
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_785960
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_785960