My Lords, Clause 4 of the Bill indicates that the finding which will be made in relation to a TPIM is that an individual has been involved in, "““the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism””;"
or in, "““conduct which facilitates the commission, preparation or instigation of such acts, or which is intended to do so””;"
or in, "““conduct which gives encouragement to the commission, preparation or instigation of such acts, or is intended to do so””;"
or in, "““conduct which gives support or assistance to individuals who are known or believed by the individual concerned to be involved in””,"
such conduct.
This is a very grave finding. As I suggested earlier, it is a finding which justifies a standard of proof on the balance of probabilities rather than reasonable belief. I support the amendment for the reasons that have already been set out.
Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Macdonald of River Glaven
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 15 November 2011.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
732 c622 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 13:58:23 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_785325
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_785325
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_785325