My Lords, I regret that I find the noble Lord’s reply to the debate pretty unsatisfactory. I have as great a respect for him as he says he has for me, and I just wish that he could have made a better case for the Government than he has. I think that the case is as weak as it could possibly be. I do not suppose that this amendment is likely to succeed, but it should and I therefore propose to divide the House.
Division on Amendment 1
Contents 79; Not-Contents 273.
Amendment 1 disagreed.
Amendments 2 to 4 not moved.
Schedule 1 : Terrorism prevention and investigation measures
Amendment 5
Schedule 1 : Terrorism prevention and investigation measures
Amendment 5
Moved by
Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Lloyd of Berwick
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 15 November 2011.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
732 c596 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 14:02:30 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_785291
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_785291
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_785291