My Lords, having been wonderfully rude about the first probing amendment of the noble Lord, Lord McKenzie, I am going to do exactly the opposite now because I regret that he announced that this was a probing amendment. This is the widest power that I have seen for many years in any potential Act of Parliament. Paragraph (d) of Clause 19(2) states that, "““the claimant is of a prescribed description””."
Subsections (3) and (4), which relate to the subsequent amendments as the noble Lord has explained, include the word ““may””. However, if ““may”” is included, ““may not”” would also be included. The phrase that sprang to mind was, ““How wide is the ocean; how deep is the sea?””. I actually think that for once the Merits Committee has not gone far enough; nor, as I said, has the noble Lord.
Welfare Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Skelmersdale
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 26 October 2011.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
731 c332GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 20:52:04 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_778141
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_778141
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_778141