No, not as ever, sometimes we are shoulder to shoulder. However, I congratulate the noble Baroness and I am grateful for her reply. It will deserve reading. I take her point about the term being used in control order legislation but I have written down, "““much the same as prima facie””."
I, for one, would not like to tangle with her over whether there is any significance in the term ““much the same””. If anybody reading Hansard who is better qualified than me thinks that one should take issue with, "““much the same as prima facie””,"
I will come back to it on Report. As I say, I will read the noble Baroness’s response. I am grateful to her for the detail. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment 24 withdrawn.
Clause 5 agreed.
Clause 6 : Prior permission of the court
Clause 6 : Prior permission of the court
Amendment 25 not moved.
Amendment 26
Moved by
Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Hamwee
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 19 October 2011.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
731 c335-6 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 18:16:22 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_775137
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_775137
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_775137