UK Parliament / Open data

Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Bill

I promise not to intervene on the noble Lord’s speech again but he is ducking the question. Does he not accept that Mr Justice Simon in that case, having weighed up the facts, came to the conclusion that the safety of the state and of the public was better protected by relocation and that it was proportionate to the interests of CD? If so, should we not keep the situation as it was then?
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
731 c320 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Back to top