I accept that the 1908 and 1948 Olympics were nothing like as commercialised as next year’s will be. Such commercialism probably goes back to the Olympiads in 1984 in Los Angeles and 1996 in Atlanta. There is a sense that there has been creeping power in the hands of large commercial interests, with ever more draconian measures being put in place. For example, particular brands of soft drink will be barred within a particular radius. Has that always been the case in the modern Olympic era since there has been more commercialisation, or have commercial interests used an increasing amount of strength to ensure that we have the draconian measures that we will debate today?
London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (Amendment) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Mark Field
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 28 April 2011.
It occurred during Debate on bills on London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (Amendment) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
527 c367 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 15:44:16 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_736630
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_736630
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_736630