Indeed. I think it sends the wrong signal at this particular time. I hope I can persuade many more hon. Members of the force of my argument.
In today's The Guardian online, there is an article, stating that coalition criminal justice plans"““make a mockery of universal jurisdiction””."
It continues:"““Giving suspects from 'protected countries' immunity from war crimes arrests would turn the UK into a safe haven for suspects””."
That was written by an eminent human rights lawyer, Daniel Machower. He goes on to say:"““A legal case for changing the current judicial process, through the senior district judge, has not been made out and parliament is entitled to reject the proposed change on that basis alone.””"
I have my own views on the Tzipi Livni case. I happen to regard the crimes documented in the Goldstone report as being pretty damning. The very strength of current system, however, is that it does not matter what my view is: it is a decision taken by a court without political considerations and on the basis of the evidence alone. That is the system that the Government are going to undermine.
Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill (Programme) (No. 2)
Proceeding contribution from
Ann Clwyd
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 30 March 2011.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
526 c455 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 15:51:55 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_732694
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_732694
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_732694