I was not a Member of Parliament at that time, unlike some of my colleagues who were in the House when the legislation was discussed in detail. I think it fair to say, however, that a great deal was left to the potential for secondary legislation. As the hon. Gentleman knows, those provisions have never yet been used. That is one of the reasons that the Calman commission specifically addressed the issue of fiscal accountability.
The hon. Gentleman may also be aware of recent debates in the Scottish Parliament following the decision of the Finance Secretary—without informing the Parliament—to advise HMRC that it would not be required to implement the rules for a few years. I do not wish to discuss that controversy, but I will say that the establishment of the Calman commission was partly due to the fact that the rules had never been implemented. Much of the detailed work that we are now considering had been put on the shelf without being properly examined. I take the hon. Gentleman's point, but I think it necessary for me to ask the Minister a number of detailed questions in order to ensure that the Government's intentions are on record.
Scotland Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Ann McKechin
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 14 March 2011.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Scotland Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
525 c78-9 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 15:10:24 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_724994
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_724994
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_724994