No. The hon. Gentleman arrived very late and was not in his place for much of the debate.
We heard a breathtaking attack from Labour Members who argued against ring- fencing. Indeed, just a few weeks ago, we heard the right hon. Member for Leigh (Andy Burnham) saying:"““It is irresponsible to increase NHS spending in real terms within the overall financial envelope””."
That was, and is, Labour's view—cuts to the NHS. That is not the coalition's view. That is why the NHS will get real-terms growth. Yes, it is a tough settlement; yes, there needs to be scope for increased productivity; and yes, management costs in the system need to be reduced. The Government, however, are determined to ensure that we reform the national health service, deliver the clinical engagement and deliver the change that will make the service better for our public. I urge the House to reject the motion.
Question put.
The House divided: Ayes 239, Noes 317.
NHS Reorganisation
Proceeding contribution from
Paul Burstow
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 17 November 2010.
It occurred during Opposition day on NHS Reorganisation.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
518 c949 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 13:51:09 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_682393
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_682393
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_682393