UK Parliament / Open data

Identity Documents Bill

Proceeding contribution from Grahame Morris (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 15 September 2010. It occurred during Debate on bills on Identity Documents Bill.
That is dangerous territory, which we explored earlier today and in Committee. If that principle is to be applied to what a Government may do, should it be applied to nationalisation without compensation? Is that the logic of the argument? The decision to terminate existing and operational ID cards one month after Royal Assent—I assume that the Bill will be passed today—with no compensation for those who have purchased cards is not only shameful, but a travesty. I mentioned that Labour had made a manifesto pledge to the public, and that the public had returned Labour to government in 2005. We implemented a scheme allowing a citizen to receive, for a £30 fee, a card which would expire in 10 years. For the current Government to come to office and turn that system on its head without consideration for those who participated in the scheme on a voluntary basis, and had handed over their money in good faith, strikes me as a complete dereliction of duty which sets a dangerous precedent for the future.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
515 c941 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Back to top