My hon. Friend makes an interesting point. During the general election, the Conservatives and Labour were united in saying, ““Don't let the Lib Dems anywhere near crime or national security—or immigration, for that matter.”” We remember some of their policies in that area. I do not blame the Lib Dems at all for the Government's policy on crime and policing. The Home Secretary has been careful to have only one Lib Dem in her team, and she is a very good Minister, but the Government have not allowed her anywhere near the important stuff in the Home Office. This policy cannot be described as a coalition approach. Certainly, the decision not to prioritise the police in the comprehensive spending review was made by the Conservatives.
I have mentioned the likely loss of police officers over the next four years. Let us have no doubt that cuts of this magnitude will also put national security at risk, as the most senior counter-terrorism officer in the UK has made clear. Insufficient resources will inevitably lead to the closure of regional counter-terrorism units, to fewer surveillance teams to monitor suspects, and to a reduction in the number of police officers who work full time on counter-terrorism.
Crime and Policing
Proceeding contribution from
Alan Johnson
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 8 September 2010.
It occurred during Opposition day on Crime and Policing.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
515 c346-7 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 18:32:39 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_663163
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_663163
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_663163