There is a feeling of déjà vu. Labour's earlier commitment to electoral reform—in the 1997 manifesto—has been mentioned. The Secretary of State will know that Lord Jenkins did a huge amount of work on that issue. I do not think that Lord Jenkins would have been happy with the way that the Government refused to live up to their manifesto commitment to hold a referendum on a choice between the status quo and what he had come up with. Has the Secretary of State had a chance in the intervening years to reflect on whether the Government can defend what they did in respect of that manifesto commitment, given that this amendment will probably be in another manifesto?
Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Evan Harris
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 8 April 2010.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
508 c1215 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 20:57:47 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_638124
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_638124
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_638124