The public are of course concerned about the objectives. That is bound to be the case with the important work of the council but process is a different matter. The case has not been made out that the public have a great interest in the process by which the council concludes its deliberations and how it has acted in those terms, or that it would advance the cause of intelligent decision-making if that was part of the Bill. That is why I object to the two amendments.
Financial Services Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 10 March 2010.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Financial Services Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
718 c301 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 20:13:26 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_629662
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_629662
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_629662