I am grateful to the noble Lord for clarifying his position. Perhaps I should not have prayed him in aid in relation to the Government’s position, and I withdraw my remarks that might have given that indication. However, he will fully accept the burden of the Government’s position. Of course we regard the high-level objectives as a matter of considerable public concern, and they should be open to full debate. However, we are talking about the mechanics and the process of the three parties, and we are against the concept of those being put out to wider consultation. Therefore, by definition, if we are against the principle of Amendment 9, we are obviously against Amendment 10. I hope the noble Baroness will withdraw the amendment and not move Amendment 10.
Financial Services Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 10 March 2010.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Financial Services Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
718 c300 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 20:13:23 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_629656
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_629656
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_629656