I apologise to the noble Earl, Lord Ferrers, for once again evidencing the fact that I still have much to learn. Of course I will not be elected, but I am looking forward, as I am sure the noble Earl understands, to the Labour Party being re-elected.
I was going to say that I have even less experience of wash-up; in fact, it meant something very different to me until about a month ago when I began to hear the term being used. As I understand it, wash-up requires all Bills to go through their remaining stages in each House and therefore to be subject to whatever scrutiny Parliament is able to provide. At a certain point the usual channels will then address the issue of what is to be done with Bills that have not completed their full parliamentary process, but I suspect that almost everyone in the House knows more about the practice of wash-up than I do.
With the exception of the noble Baroness’s amendment, which I have indicated that the Government are happy to accept, I urge her not to press her other amendments.
Financial Services Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Myners
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 10 March 2010.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Financial Services Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
718 c263-4 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 20:29:52 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_629562
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_629562
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_629562