My Lords, I am not aware that that is the case. I certainly do not think that there is any basis on which anyone could have been told correctly that they would be TUPE-ed on 1 April unless that was conditional on the Bill receiving parliamentary approval. I can envisage a situation where that information could have been conveyed and shared with people, which would have been perfectly fair and reasonable in terms of giving them a good understanding and in addressing uncertainty. But I do not think that any clear indication could have been given that people will be TUPE-ed. If during Committee stage I am advised by officials that that is not the case, I will obviously immediately advise the House.
Perhaps I may now turn to the noble Baroness’s amendments. As the noble Lord, Lord Newby, said—
Financial Services Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Myners
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 10 March 2010.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Financial Services Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
718 c257 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 20:29:55 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_629554
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_629554
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_629554