My Lords, I speak as somebody who supports the Bill and I am therefore somewhat confused by this group of amendments, although for a different reason from that given by the noble Lord who has just spoken. I do not support the amendment moved by the noble Earl, Lord Howe, but I support Amendment 29, which provides for a transition between one local authority and another. I think that was part of the Government’s original intention when we discussed the Bill earlier. However, the rest of the amendments in the group, and particularly the Question whether Clause 1 should stand part, cut right across the general intent of the Bill, and I certainly would not be in favour of that. As I said at Second Reading, I support the intention of the Bill; I support what the Government want to do for these—mostly elderly—people who are in the neediest group. This is, I understand, a first step towards a much bigger national care programme, which I think many of us in this House would fully support. In the mean time, I support the Bill and therefore cannot support the amendments in this group, except Amendment 29.
Personal Care at Home Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Turner of Camden
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 22 February 2010.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Personal Care at Home Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
717 c838 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 19:56:16 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_622394
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_622394
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_622394