Could I not suggest to the noble Lord that his amendment is completely redundant, given that the concerns he wishes to express, which I am sure that we all share, are fully covered in Clause 8(5)(a)? Unless we are going into a Second Reading debate on the Government’s economic back-to-work policies and their strategies on unemployment across the nation as a whole, I do not see how the amendment will add anything to the Bill beyond what is already in that paragraph.
Child Poverty Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Hollis of Heigham
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 25 January 2010.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Child Poverty Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
716 c279-80GC 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:51:58 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_614132
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_614132
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_614132