That will not do, because the Secretary of State will have had advice from the commission, which will have had lots of information given to it. The Secretary of State could not just tear it up and say that he would not have any regard to it. That advice would cover not just the four individual targets but would address issues, one presumes, around socio-economic disadvantage. To write it off in the way the noble Lord has done is not appropriate. I accept his point that it is not as tightly and specifically defined as a clearly measurable target. However, there is a clear obligation on the Secretary of State to have a UK strategy that must do two things. In preparing that strategy, the Secretary of State must consider certain things. My noble friend had it right: the collection of requirements gives full value to the wording of the clause.
Child Poverty Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord McKenzie of Luton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 25 January 2010.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Child Poverty Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
716 c279GC 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:14:13 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_614128
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_614128
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_614128