I thank the Minister for that. I remain baffled about what Clause 8(2)(b) adds by adding an ill defined word to the process. The strategy in Clause 8 is to achieve precisely defined targets. Clause 8(2)(b) throws in that the Secretary of State must ensure that children, ""do not experience socio-economic disadvantage"."
In debates on earlier amendments, the Minister leant on that phrase. In particular, he said that it implies a responsibility for the Minister that is broader than just meeting the targets and that that is why it is there. That is why I am concerned. When we look at the clause closely, when it is undefined, we see that it does not add anything. If a Secretary of State were to say, "I don’t know what it means. I did my best, guv", that would be a defence in law. If that is the case, if we are doing pinpoint—
Child Poverty Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Freud
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 25 January 2010.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Child Poverty Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
716 c278-9GC 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:28:39 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_614127
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_614127
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_614127