I had spotted that earlier. However, that is two or three years out of date and, for a lot of other reasons, I think that minimum income standards are a much better tool with which to make more accurate policy decisions. I thank the Minister for his response and I shall of course withdraw these amendments and reflect on what has been said. It was very disappointing in that he said that this is all too difficult because of work disincentives. If the Minister does not think that money has to be deployed between now and 2020 in some way, then he will never get to his targets. I understand the argument that, if you set benefit levels too high, people stay at home. I do not think that anyone is arguing for that, but he seemed to hide behind it and say, "This is all a waste of time because it flies in the face of established policy". That is what he seemed to be saying .
Child Poverty Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 25 January 2010.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Child Poverty Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
716 c261GC 
Session
2009-10
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:06:23 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_614078
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_614078
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_614078